Tristan Lamasine vs Jarkko Nieminen Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L L W W L
Form
W W L L L L L W W WCara A Cara: Lamasine 1 - 0 Nieminen
Ellas han jugado 3 conjuntos en total, con Lamasine victoriosa 2 y Nieminen victoriosa 1. El último partido entre Lamasine y Nieminen fue en el Tampere Challenger, el 25-07-2015, Cuartos de Semifinals, Clay, con Tristan Lamasine obteniendo la victoria 5-7 7-6(6) 7-5
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tristan Lamasine | 1 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 |
Tampere Challenger(25-07-2015)
5
7
7
6
7
5
| Lamasine | Estadísticas | Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 650 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 181 | Highest Rank | 13 |
| 32 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 6 | Titles | 12 |
| 54% (440-369) | Total de Carrera V/D | 58% (574-409) |
| 57% (13-10) | Ganar/Perder | 0% (0-0) |
| $160,780 | Prize Money de Carrera | $3,231,200 |
| 1 | YTD Títulos | 0 |
| 1 | Arcilla H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Svitolina VS Sakkari PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 |
Stats 
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 1 |
| 19 | Juegos Ganados | 18 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Faltas dobles totales | 2 |
| 2:42:9 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 2:42:9 |
| 60% (69/115) | % De Primer Servicio | 57% (71/124) |
| 78% (54/69) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 68% (48/71) |
| 46% (21/46) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 58% (31/53) |
| 31% (4/13) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 36% (45/124) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 35% (40/115) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Tristan Lamasine
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Alex Marti Pujolras
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
55 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Tristan Lamasine
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
52
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Perot
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
10 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Tristan Lamasine
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Leo Raquillet
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Maxence Bertimon
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Hamish Stewart
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 6-7(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Loann Massard
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Jarkko Nieminen
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (440/369) | Win/Loss | 58% (574/409) |
| 53% (985/880) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1408/1109) |
| 51% (9098/8680) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12634/11470) |
| 58% (88/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (158/143) |
| 52% (178/166) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (202/120) |
| 56% (170/136) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (187/114) |
| 57% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (27/32) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2123 | Aces Total | 1850 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1638 | Total Double Faults | 1180 |
| 1:16:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 520.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 524.36 |
| 64% (28383/44484) | 1st Serve % | 66% (29581/44936) |
| 68% (19227/28383) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (20221/29561) |
| 50% (8112/16101) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7706/15364) |
| 42% (1741/4145) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1744/4112) |
| 39% (17314/44116) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16915/44087) |
| 38% (9/15) | Slam W/L | 53% (59/53) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 47% (75/85) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 81% (42/10) |
| 39% (13/20) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (270/211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (245/233) | Challenger W/L | 73% (126/47) |
| 63% (173/100) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (426/790) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (475/820) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (93/155) |
| 56% (145/259) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (198/364) |
| 55% (138/253) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (185/330) |
| 85% (420/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (559/472) |
| 15% (420/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (559/86) |
| 21% (389/80) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (424/99) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
